Top 10 Questions for Neera Tanden

Before Neera Tanden can become Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Senators must approve. And before that, they must ask questions. Here are some suggestions for what they should ask.

1. You supported an attack on Libya that proved fraudulently marketed, illegal, and catastrophic in results, after which you argued in an email to your colleagues for trying to force Libya to pay via oil profits for the privilege of having been bombed. You wrote that this would be a good solution to a U.S. budget deficit. One of your colleagues replied that such a policy might create a financial incentive for attacking more countries. What countries, if any, would you most favor attacking and then billing for the service?

2. Reclaiming, thank you, reclaiming my time, what criteria do you think one should use if one were to select the countries most appropriate to attack and then bill for it?

3. You suggested in your email that the U.S. public would better support future wars if the wars’ victims paid for them. You hope to oversee a budget that is tipped more heavily toward militarism than most, and possibly any, other national government on earth. A majority of U.S. discretionary spending goes into militarism. You come to the job from a think tank funded, in part, by weapons companies and foreign dictatorships that do business with those weapons companies — a think tank that has taken very weapons-friendly positions, even refusing to oppose the war on Yemen. How does that qualify you to oversee the sort of conversion to peaceful practices that will be required for survival and prosperity?

4. You suggested in that same email that the alternatives to making countries pay for being bombed would be to cut Headstart or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, or Medicaid. How do those alternatives make it onto the list of possibilities, while reducing military spending does not, reducing police and prison and border patrol and ICE and CIA and NSA spending does not, taxing corporations does not, taxing billionaires does not, taxing financial transactions does not, taxing carbon does not?

5. You spent much of your nine years running a think tank courting major corporate donors, and producing corporate-friendly policies. You instructed your staff to check whether content might offend big donors prior to publishing. You even censored major work products to appease big donors, such as deleting a report chapter on New York police abuse of Muslims after Michael Bloomberg chipped in over $1 million. You also censored criticism of the government of Israel and gave a platform in Washington to its leader. You kept much of your think tank’s funding secret, and the reasons why were pretty clear from what became public. How does this qualify you to serve the public in an open and transparent and representative government?

6. You’ve long advocated cutting Social Security, one of the most successful and popular U.S. government programs ever. Is that still your position, and why or why not?

7. You claim that you pushed, while observers say you punched, a reporter for asking Hillary Clinton about her support for the war on Iraq. Can you provide the Senate with guidelines for the sort of questions to which the proper response is physical assault? Does this question qualify? Do you, honestly, right now, want to punch me?

8. You have outraged numerous political opponents, including members of both major political parties in this Senate. Much of what you’ve already been asked about, we only know about because you outraged your own employees. You once outed an anonymous victim of sexual harassment, which shocked and outraged those involved. What qualifies you as the best person to work harmoniously with every agency in the U.S. government?

9. You sought to delegitimize the 2016 U.S. presidential election, not with serious documented complaints, but with baseless claims that the Russian government infiltrated and manipulated the vote counting. Did you believe those claims? Do you believe them now? Do you take any responsibility for the large numbers of other people who believe them now?

10. What would be one example of a situation in which you would choose to become a whistleblower?

Add more questions for Neera Tanden as comments on this page.
Read Top 10 Questions for Avril Haines.
Read Top 10 Questions for Antony Blinken.

Further reading:
Norman Solomon: Neera Tanden and Antony Blinken Personify the ‘Moderate’ Rot at the Top of the Democratic Party
Glenn Greenwald: Leaked Emails From Pro-Clinton Group Reveal Censorship of Staff on Israel, AIPAC Pandering, Warped Militarism
Glenn Greenwald: Biden Appointee Neera Tanden Spread the Conspiracy That Russian Hackers Changed Hillary’s 2016 Votes to Trump

2 Replies to “Top 10 Questions for Neera Tanden”

  1. Other questions:

    Do you find that advocating war crimes and mass murder abroad, and sadistic, corporate-profit-enhancing austerity at home, pays well, and would you suggest it as a career path for motivated, capable young girls of all backgrounds?

    Is phrenology sufficient for eugenics purposes in our modern world, or should there be increased advocacy and funding for applying genomics and bio-tech guided AI, along with security-agency-enforced harvesting of civilian genetic material, for the purposes of weeding out redundancy and culling the herd?

    Under what circumstances should a Biden regime be willing to use DIME weapons on a children’s hospital?

    And a follow up:

    Should the US allow the outsourcing of production of DIME weapons to Israel, for their own use, eliminating inconvenient delays in delivery, and decreasing turnaround time for use, when actionable intelligence dictates, or should the US remain the sole source of these valuable tools of diplomacy?

  2. Ms. Tanden, in your e-mail in which you suggested that the United States ‘pay’ for its war with sales of seized Libyan oil, did the illegality of our doing so under international law, specifically the Geneva Conventions’ prohibition of doing same, which conventions we are a signatory to, and which consequently are the supreme law of the land, ever cross your mind? If they did, what excuses did you have in mind then for our breaking the law? Do you still hold to these excuses? If so, why? If not, please explain why your opinion on the matter changed. If, on the other hand, if the illegality of our seizing Libyan oil via a war of ours against them never crossed your mind then, what excuses do you have for being so ignorant of the Geneva Conventions? Does not that ignorance show your complete unfitness for your Cabinet position? What other fundamental areas of law and history are you then so ignorant of? Please elaborate at necessary length on this matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.